A Green Response to Gordon’s Speech

Anybody who follows British politics or media knows that it’s party conference season. This week, it’s the turn of Labour, who’ve gathered in Brighton Conference Centre – right in the middle of a seat which will almost certainly turn Green in the next election. The Labour Party is doing its best to defy the rather clever billboards we’ve put up in the city:

Labour is Old News in Brighton

At that conference today, Gordon Brown made a very good speech. If the Prime Minister could get his presentation this good all the time, and the Labour Party follows suit, then Labour has a fighting chance of doing a John Major and winning the next election, albeit by a slim margin. However, I thought I’d pick out a few bits of the speech that particularly caught my attention. The negative tone of much of what follows doesn’t mean that there wasn’t much in the way of good stuff in the speech. It merely means that there’s a lot more to say about the stuff that I have concerns about.

Read More »

Creation and Environment 4: The ball’s in our court

Continuing our series on reasons that Christians should care about the environment, today we deal with a bit of the Bible that has sometimes been misinterpreted to justify environmental destruction, but which actually means that we have a responsibility to look after the environment.

But before we begin, here’s a list of links to the rest of the series:

Part 1: Environment: Who Cares?
Part 2: Environment: Who Owns it?
Part 3: Environment: It is Good

At the end of Genesis chapter 1, the Bible says:

Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”

In the past many Christians have interpreted this passage to mean that we can do whatever we like to the planet and the life that exists upon it. And whilst it may seem, reading this in isolation, that it is a valid interpretation, I don’t think that it remotely reflects the relationship God intends us to have with the rest of creation.

Read More »

Pre-Copenhagen Posturing

There seems to be a lot of pro-environment posturing going on in the run-up to the Copenhagen climate congress. Hopefully this increases the chance of the summit coming up with a deal that will actually reduce carbon emissions by a substantial amount. However, the cynic in me thinks that a lot of this is going to prove to be greenwash – there may be tough talk, but Copenhagen may produce the same kind of token deal we saw at Kyoto.

In the last few days we’ve had the following:

Read More »

Creation and Environment 3: It is Good

Continuing our series on reasons Christians should care about the environment.

Part 1: Environment: Who Cares?
Part 2: Environment: Who Owns it?

One thing that the Bible teaches again and again about creation is that it is good. God said that every part of it was good when He was creating it in Genesis chapter 1, the Psalms are full of verses about nature, and God spends several chapters at the end of Job describing how awesome creation is.

This is something that everyone, not just Christians, can agree with. We’ve all seen pretty flowers, amazing sunrises and sunsets, spectacular mountains, impressive animals, vast oceans, and the like (if you haven’t seen them in person, then you’ve probably still seen them on TV). Such things are self-evidently good. If you can’t see that, then you urgently need to see a psychiatrist.

So, having established that the environment is good, what does that mean for our attitudes towards it?
Read More »

Morality and Economics

Last night on Newsnight, Archbishop of Canterbury made an argument that economics should not be left solely to economists. Implicit in his comments was the belief that economics is a matter of morality as well as a matter of money.

He does, in fact, have a point. Read More »

News from the blogosphere

I was going to post the next in the series about Christianity and the environment that I’ve been running at weekends, but my PC blew up, so you’ll have to wait until next weekend for the next instalment.

Instead, I’ll just point you to a few other great blog posts.

Andy D’Agorne points out that phone boxes can become electric car recharging points. Sounds like a very good idea to me.

The Church Mouse asks the very good question of why there isn’t a unified climate change campaign in the run-up to Copehagen. As the Green Party, and/or as Christians, we should definitely try to work towards sending a unified message on this one.

The Green Room highlights a humanist who is being deported to Afghanistan for apostasy, where he faces the death penalty for apostasy – having publicly renounced Islam. A world where somebody is not free to abandon the faith they grew up with is not one I, as a Christian or as a Green, want to live in. If you don’t believe in a religion or an ideology you should be free to walk away from it whenever you want, without fear of being murdered for doing so. That our own government should be willing to send somebody to a country which is trying to murder him for changing his faith is utterly appalling.

act now to stop this travesty of “justice” now

Climate Change in the news

The BBC have a brief feature on a prototype floating wind turbine. Unfortunately, the technology won’t be commercially viable for another decade. Which means that the immediate future of wind power is likely to require convincing NIMBYs that it’s in their best interest to sacrifice the purity of the view out their window in order to combat climate change.

Meanwhile, the government claims that they are working to ensure that they are aiming to build a competitive advantage in ultra-low carbon vehicles. Living in a city which still contains several car factories, I would like to believe that this is more than just talk. Sadly, however, the government’s lack of commitment to the Vestas wind turbine factory suggests otherwise.

And France looks set to take some action against climate change by introducing a carbon tax. Unfortunately, the industries where it might make the most difference seem to be exempt.

Membership and elections

The recent news that the Conservative party is losing its members offers a great opportunity for other parties. Falling party membership usually means that the party membership is, in large part, disillusioned with the direction in which their party is going. Not only are there fewer members to campaign for the party, but also those left are likely to share many of the reservations of those who have left, and hence be less enthusiastic.

In fact, even the Tories’ core activists appear to be having doubts. There are quite a few Tory activists who want to see Nigel Farage take Tom Bercow’s seat in Buckingham (see, for example, the comments here). Apparently they think that he’s “too new Labour” which, given that new Labour is virtually indistinguishable from the Tories in policy terms, doesn’t bode well for David Cameron’s future.

Labour are, likewise, in disarray – knowing that they are on course to lose the next General Election, and fighting each other, rather than fighting to change their collective fortune.

This means that smaller parties like the Greens, have a massive opportunity for breakthrough. Green membership is growing, our share of the vote went up by more than anybody else’s in the European Elections – and did so across the country, and we managed to quadruple our share of the vote in the Norwich North By-Election. In fact, we are more popular amongst those thinking of switching their vote than the Tories.

The best example of how much difference having highly motivated activists on the ground makes is Barack Obama’s presidential election campaign. The most important factor in his win over John McCain was the massive emphasis he placed on having activists on the ground. Every other aspect of his campaign was built around his ground game.

If we can get those who voted for us to become members and activists, , if we can equip them to be effective campaigners in towns and cities across the country, and if we can direct their efforts to the wards and constituencies where they will have the greatest effect, then we have a good chance of becoming and remaining a major player in British politics and getting much of our policy agenda enacted.

Who owns the environment?

This post continues the series I started last weekend about the core principles that should lead Christians to care about the environment.

The question of how the universe came into being should have major implications for how we approach it. What we think of our place in the universe is vital to our understanding of how we relate to it. To take one example, a Young Earth Creationist should be far more concerned about the extinction of a species (as he or she believes it to be irreplaceable – apart from divine intervention), than somebody who believes we got here via evolution (as he or she believes that species extinctions are part of the way the world works).

As a Christian, my understanding of where everything came from begins with the first words of the Bible – “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the Earth”. For Christians, everything has – ultimately – been made by God. Those Christians who believe that God used evolution and those who believe in Intelligent Design or various forms of Creationism share this same perspective that God created it all.

This has two main consequences for the way Christians should think about the world around us. Both of which, ultimately, should lead us to be concerned about environmental issues.

Read More »

Geo-engineering

The BBC reports that the Royal Society has been evaluating the possibilities of Geo-Engineering to reduce climate change.

Geo-engineering, if you haven’t come across the term before, means dealing with climate change in ways that don’t involve cutting carbon emissions. The report examines a whole range of technologies which are said to be able to counteract the increase in the number of greenhouse gases, all of which require further research to be feasible.

The report takes the rather sensible line that these options should not become a diversion from efforts to reduce carbon emissions. It also points out that the technologies all have serious risks and uncertainties. But it does outline which options look the most practical should we come to that point.

My own conclusion from reading the summary is that the use of geo-engineering techniques would indicate that the human race has failed to take seriously our duty to care for the planet we live on. However, if we fail to take appropriate action now, then these more risky and costly alternatives may prove a necessary evil.

Our response to this report should be to increase our efforts to reduce carbon emissions, in order to ensure that such methods do not become necessary.

Read More »